Vacheron Constantin

I completely understand your preference for the Overseas, especially considering the WR and ruggedness. But from a design perspective the MCC Date is absolutely wonderful and I prefer it over any Overseas, personally. Keep us posted when your VC visit is

There are elements on these that I do like quite a bit, but also elements which I am not fond of at all.... Given the saturation in the market for this type of timepiece, my preference still firmly lies with VC and the Overseas line in particular. So many

At an auction recently I saw this nice VC, and was about to bid, until I had a mixed feeling popping up. The crown is not original which can be easily spotted, but the dial particularly caught my attention: I had never seen before "Malta Cross" indexes at

When I started paying attention to high horology - long before I could actually afford one - I was heavily influenced by the Holy Trinity marketing. I considered PP, AP and VC to be absolutely pure, independent family owned (or at least privately owned) m

I actually quite like the Zeitwerk Date as photographed - in the abstract. When I had a chance to handle one a few weeks ago, I discovered that I could not read the date without reading glasses on, and with some difficulty even with the glasses. For my ey

Vacheron Constantin Historiques 1942 #ref.3110V/000A-B426

And I thought they are quite nice. The titanium case and bracelet looked and felt great and the straps are equally nice. I especially like the various finishes on the dials. Brand: Vacheron Constantin Model: Overseas Dual Time Cardinal Points Reference Nu

Chopard Strike One in salmon dial VC Overseas Dual time VC overseas ultra thin 40 mm Patek Nautilus 38 mm no date JLC master Chronometre date (but hugely disappointed with low WR, no screwed down crown and no lume) IWC pilot Venturer (despite the thicknes